Gong Sun Chou II · 孟子 2B.3
Passage 03
陳臻問曰:「前日於齊,王饋兼金一百而不受;於宋,饋七十鎰而受;於薛,饋五十鎰而受。前日之不受是,則今日之受非也;今日之受是,則前日之不受非也;夫子必居一於此矣。」孟子曰:「皆是也。當在宋也,予將有遠行;行者必以贐,辭曰『饋贐』,予何為不受?當在薛也,予有戒心,辭曰『聞戒故為兵饋之』,予何為不受?若於齊則未有處也。無處而饋之,是貨之也;焉有君子而可以貨取乎?」
Chen Zhen asked Mencius, saying, 'Formerly, when you were in Qi, the king sent you a present Of 2,400 taels of fine silver, and you refused to accept it. When you were in Song, 1,680 taels were sent to you, which you accepted; and when you were in Xue, 1,200 taels were sent, which you likewise accepted. If your declining to accept the gift in the first case was right, your accepting it in the latter cases was wrong. If your accepting it in the latter cases was right, your declining to do so in the first case was wrong. You must accept, Master, one of these alternatives.' Mencius said, 'I did right in all the cases. When I was in Song, I was about to take a long journey. Travellers must be provided with what is necessary for their expenses. The prince's message was, 'A present against travelling-expenses." Why should I have declined the gift? When I was in Xue, I was apprehensive for my safety, and taking measures for my protection. The message was, "I have heard that you are taking measures to protect yourself, and send this to help you in procuring arms." Why should I have declined the gift? But when I was in Qi, I had no occasion for money. To send a man a gift when he has no occasion for it, is to bribe him. How is it possible that a superior man should be taken with a bribe?'
First-principles reading
Begin with the words and context, expose the premise beneath the argument, then test the conditions and limits of the principle.