Gong Sun Chou II · 孟子 2B.8

Passage 08

shěntóngwènyuēyànmèngyuēkuàirényànzhīshòuyànkuàiyǒushìéryuèzhīgàowángérzhīzhī祿juéshìwángmìngérshòuzhīshìrényànhuòwènyuēquànyànyǒuzhūyuēwèishěntóngwènyànyīngzhīyuēránérzhīyuēshúzhījiāngyīngzhīyuēwéitiānzhījīnyǒushārénzhěhuòwènzhīyuērénshājiāngyīngzhīyuēyuēshúshāzhījiāngyīngzhīyuēwéishìshīshāzhījīnyànyànwéiquànzhīzāi

Shen Tong, on his own impulse, asked Mencius, saying, 'May Yan be smitten?' Mencius replied, 'It may. Zi Kuai had no right to give Yan to another man, and Zi Zhi had no right to receive Yan from Zi Kuai. Suppose there were an officer here, with whom you, Sir, were pleased, and that, without informing the king, you were privately to give to him your salary and rank; and suppose that this officer, also without the king's orders, were privately to receive them from you - would such a transaction be allowable? And where is the difference between the case of Yan and this?' The people of Qi smote Yan. Some one asked Mencius, saying, 'Is it really the case that you advised Qi to smite Yan?' He replied, 'No. Shen Tong asked me whether Yan might be smitten, and I answered him, "It may." They accordingly went and smote it. If he had asked me, "Who may smite it?" I would have answered him, "He who is the minister of Heaven may smite it." Suppose the case of a murderer, and that one asks me, "May this man be put to death?" I will answer him, "He may." If he ask me, "Who may put him to death?" I will answer him, "The chief criminal judge may put him to death." But now with one Yan to smite another Yan - how should I have advised this?'

First-principles reading

Begin with the words and context, expose the premise beneath the argument, then test the conditions and limits of the principle.