Jin Xin I · 孟子 7A.35
Passage 35
桃應問曰:「舜為天子,皋陶為士,瞽瞍殺人,則如之何?」孟子曰:「執之而已矣。」「然則舜不禁與?」曰:「夫舜惡得而禁之?夫有所受之也。」「然則舜如之何?」曰:「舜視棄天下,猶棄敝蹝也。竊負而逃,遵海濱而處,終身欣然,樂而忘天下。」
Tao Ying asked, saying, 'Shun being sovereign, and Gao Yao chief minister of justice, if Gu Sou had murdered a man, what would have been done in the case?' Mencius said, 'Gao Yao would simply have apprehended him.' 'But would not Shun have forbidden such a thing?' 'Indeed, how could Shun have forbidden it? Gao Yao had received the law from a proper source.' 'In that case what would Shun have done?' 'Shun would have regarded abandoning the kingdom as throwing away a worn-out sandal. He would privately have taken his father on his back, and retired into concealment, living some where along the sea-coast. There he would have been all his life, cheerful and happy, forgetting the kingdom.'
First-principles reading
Begin with the words and context, expose the premise beneath the argument, then test the conditions and limits of the principle.